EPYC 7373X vs Core 2 Extreme X7800
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2689 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.54 | no data |
Architecture codename | Merom XE (2007) | Milan-X (2022) |
Release date | 17 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 32 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 768 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 291 Million | 33,200 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
Socket | PPGA478 | SP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 17 July 2007 | 22 March 2022 |
Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
Threads | 2 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 240 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X7800 has 445.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X7800 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.