Atom N470 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2689not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.54no data
Architecture codenameMerom XE (2007)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)1 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$75

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X7800 1138
+408%
Atom N470 224

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme X7800 2079
+287%
Atom N470 538

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 1 March 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X7800 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom N470, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Atom N470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X7800
Core 2 Extreme X7800
Intel Atom N470
Atom N470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X7800 or Atom N470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.