A6-8500P vs Core 2 Extreme X6800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X6800
2 cores / 2 threads, 75 Watt
0.69
A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.91
+31.9%

A6-8500P outperforms Core 2 Extreme X6800 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27102523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency0.875.72
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataNot Listed
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and A6-8500P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 0.69
A6-8500P 0.91
+31.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 1095
A6-8500P 1445
+32%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.91
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

A6-8500P has a 31.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The A6-8500P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X6800 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Extreme X6800 is a desktop processor while A6-8500P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X6800 and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Extreme X6800
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X6800 or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.