Xeon X5355 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.90
+127%
Xeon X5355
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
1.28

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Xeon X5355 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16582279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.021.01
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)14 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °C63 °C
Number of transistors820 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-+
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.90
+127%
Xeon X5355 1.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+127%
Xeon X5355 2033

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 1.28
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 120 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has a 126.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X5355, on the other hand, has 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5355 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Xeon X5355
Xeon X5355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 241 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X5355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Xeon X5355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.