Core i5-3340 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.90
+9%
Core i5-3340
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
2.66

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Core i5-3340 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16581709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.023.27
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache12 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt77 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDIno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.90
+9%
i5-3340 2.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+9.1%
i5-3340 4227

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 2.66
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 77 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has a 9% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-3340, on the other hand, has a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 76.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core i5-3340
Core i5-3340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 241 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 193 votes

Rate Core i5-3340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Core i5-3340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.