Apple M1 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.90
Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.17
+78.3%

Apple M1 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16661206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency2.02no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)136 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.90
Apple M1 5.17
+78.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
Apple M1 8207
+78%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 5.17
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 241 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2249 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.