Celeron J1900 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data6.81
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release dateNovember 2007 (17 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
FSB parity+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 118 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9650 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.