E2-1800 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.32
+371%
E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms E2-1800 by a whopping 371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22773148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)AMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.971.48
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release dateno data6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die size2x 143 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors582 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and E2-1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7340

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.32
+371%
E2-1800 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118
+375%
E2-1800 446

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2725
+145%
E2-1800 1110

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 9520
+349%
E2-1800 2121

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 4022
+272%
E2-1800 1083

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 3
+372%
E2-1800 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.28
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 18 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has a 371.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

E2-1800, on the other hand, has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 622.2% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E2-1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD E2-1800
E2-1800

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 179 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or E2-1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.