Celeron E3500 vs Core 2 Duo U7700

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo U7700
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.27
Celeron E3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59
+119%

Celeron E3500 outperforms Core 2 Duo U7700 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31272801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.99
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.560.86
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date27 July 2006 (18 years ago)29 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$62

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.33 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Number of transistors291 Million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-0.975V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo U7700 0.27
Celeron E3500 0.59
+119%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo U7700 429
Celeron E3500 935
+118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.59
Recency 27 July 2006 29 August 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo U7700 has 550% lower power consumption.

Celeron E3500, on the other hand, has a 118.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron E3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo U7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo U7700 is a notebook processor while Celeron E3500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7700 and Celeron E3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo U7700
Core 2 Duo U7700
Intel Celeron E3500
Celeron E3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate Celeron E3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo U7700 or Celeron E3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.