Celeron M 520 vs Core 2 Duo U7600

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo U7600
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.22
+46.7%
Celeron M 520
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.15

Core 2 Duo U7600 outperforms Celeron M 520 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31873304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency2.080.47
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date27 July 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-0.975V0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo U7600 0.22
+46.7%
Celeron M 520 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo U7600 347
+45.2%
Celeron M 520 239

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 30 Watt

Core 2 Duo U7600 has a 46.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo U7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7600 and Celeron M 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo U7600
Core 2 Duo U7600
Intel Celeron M 520
Celeron M 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo U7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 50 votes

Rate Celeron M 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo U7600 or Celeron M 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.