Core i3-3217UE vs Core 2 Duo T9900
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-3217UE outperforms Core 2 Duo T9900 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2648 | 2552 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.03 | 4.77 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 2 June 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.2125V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | unknown Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD 4000 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.78 | 0.89 |
| Recency | 2 June 2009 | 1 August 2012 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
i3-3217UE has a 14.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-3217UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9900 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9900 and Core i3-3217UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
