Celeron T3300 vs Core 2 Duo T9800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2639not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$530no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.92 GHzno data
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T9800 1216
+92.1%
Celeron T3300 633

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 1 January 2010

Celeron T3300 has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9800 and Celeron T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Core 2 Duo T9800
Intel Celeron T3300
Celeron T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 66 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 17 votes

Rate Celeron T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9800 or Celeron T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.