Phenom II X3 P820 vs Core 2 Duo T8300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.93
+40.9%
Phenom II X3 P820
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 25 Watt
0.66

Core 2 Duo T8300 outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25122740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency2.512.50
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache3 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T8300 0.93
+40.9%
Phenom II X3 P820 0.66

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T8300 2626
+68.4%
Phenom II X3 P820 1560

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T8300 4837
+16%
Phenom II X3 P820 4169

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T8300 2143
+4.9%
Phenom II X3 P820 2043

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.66
Recency 10 January 2008 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Duo T8300 has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Phenom II X3 P820, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Phenom II X3 P820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
AMD Phenom II X3 P820
Phenom II X3 P820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 265 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 48 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8300 or Phenom II X3 P820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.