Celeron U3400 vs Core 2 Duo T8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2504not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.50no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate800 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA479,PGA478BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8300 1472
+185%
Celeron U3400 516

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T8300 306
+73.9%
Celeron U3400 176

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T8300 484
+54.6%
Celeron U3400 313

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2008 24 May 2010
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron U3400 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 264 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8300 or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.