Atom Z510 vs Core 2 Duo T8300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2509 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 2.49 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Silverthorne (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $20 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11 |
| L1 cache | no data | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 24.18 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | 0.75-1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | PBGA441 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | + |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 2 April 2008 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T8300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom Z510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1650% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Atom Z510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
