Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Core 2 Duo T7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7500
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 135 Watt
12.79
+2360%

Xeon E5-4667 v4 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by a whopping 2360% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2857594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.19
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency1.418.97
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date8 May 2007 (17 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$234$5,729

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate800 MHz2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB4.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB45 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size143 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C87 °C
Number of transistors291 Million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data46 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7500 0.52
Xeon E5-4667 v4 12.79
+2360%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7500 828
Xeon E5-4667 v4 20319
+2354%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 12.79
Recency 8 May 2007 20 June 2016
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7500 has 285.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4667 v4, on the other hand, has a 2359.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7500 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-4667 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon E5-4667 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 181 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo T7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 58 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7500 or Xeon E5-4667 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.