Celeron M 530 vs Core 2 Duo T7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7500
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
+174%
Celeron M 530
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.19

Core 2 Duo T7500 outperforms Celeron M 530 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28743249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency1.410.60
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date8 May 2007 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$234no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V - 1.25V0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7500 0.52
+174%
Celeron M 530 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7500 828
+174%
Celeron M 530 302

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T7500 2308
+42.9%
Celeron M 530 1615

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T7500 1906
+158%
Celeron M 530 739

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 0.19
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7500 has a 173.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 530, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron M 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 181 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo T7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7500 or Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.