Xeon w9-3495X vs Core 2 Duo T7100

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated21
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.69
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiencyno data15.65
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$197$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads2112
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB105 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size143 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7100 604
Xeon w9-3495X 91936
+15121%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T7100 211
Xeon w9-3495X 2111
+900%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T7100 355
Xeon w9-3495X 18577
+5133%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 15 February 2023
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 2 112
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7100 has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7100 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7100 and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
Core 2 Duo T7100
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 59 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7100 or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.