Core 2 Duo T5450 vs Core 2 Duo T6400

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T6400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
+24.3%
Core 2 Duo T5450
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.37

Core 2 Duo T6400 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5450 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29413047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCore 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.241.03
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V1.075V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T6400 0.46
+24.3%
Core 2 Duo T5450 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6400 729
+25%
Core 2 Duo T5450 583

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T6400 233
+22%
Core 2 Duo T5450 191

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T6400 364
+11.3%
Core 2 Duo T5450 327

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T6400 2115
+27%
Core 2 Duo T5450 1666

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T6400 4005
+28.3%
Core 2 Duo T5450 3122

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T6400 1768
+29.3%
Core 2 Duo T5450 1367

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.37
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Duo T6400 has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo T6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T5450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Duo T5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
Core 2 Duo T6400
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
Core 2 Duo T5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 88 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 48 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6400 or Core 2 Duo T5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.