Xeon Gold 6526Y vs Core 2 Duo T5470

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T5470
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.37
Xeon Gold 6526Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 195 Watt
28.97
+7730%

Xeon Gold 6526Y outperforms Core 2 Duo T5470 by a whopping 7730% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3025154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.09
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.0014.06
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.075V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5470 0.37
Xeon Gold 6526Y 28.97
+7730%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5470 590
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025
+7701%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 28.97
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 195 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5470 has 457.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has a 7729.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6526Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T5470 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6526Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5470 and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5470
Core 2 Duo T5470
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5470 or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.