Celeron 2.0 vs Core 2 Duo SP7700
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Core 2 Duo | no data |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | September 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | no data | 146 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 55 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | 478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 73 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 73 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SP7700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 265% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo SP7700 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.0 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP7700 and Celeron 2.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.