EPYC 75F3 vs Core 2 Duo SP7500
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 75F3 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP7500 by a whopping 12479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3084 | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 14.57 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 15 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,860 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.95 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 29.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 42.77 |
| Recency | 15 January 2008 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 280 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SP7500 has 1300% lower power consumption.
EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 12479.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP7500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a notebook processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP7500 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
