Microsoft SQ1 vs Core 2 Duo SL9380
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1482 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 20 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 August 2009 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SL9380 has 17547.1% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
