Celeron M 722 vs Core 2 Duo P9500

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency2.37no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478VGA956
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 1 October 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 5 Watt

Core 2 Duo P9500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P9500 and Celeron M 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9500
Core 2 Duo P9500
Intel Celeron M 722
Celeron M 722

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P9500 or Celeron M 722, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.