FX-8170 vs Core 2 Duo P8400
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2843 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.01 | no data |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478 | AM3+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 15 July 2008 | 23 October 2012 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Core 2 Duo P8400 has 400% lower power consumption.
FX-8170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8400 is a notebook processor while FX-8170 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8400 and FX-8170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.