Atom Z520 vs Core 2 Duo P8400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.01no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$65

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate1066 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache128 KB56 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15V0.75-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P8400 849
+596%
Atom Z520 122

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P8400 2497
+456%
Atom Z520 449

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P8400 4630
+572%
Atom Z520 690

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P8400 2036
+421%
Atom Z520 391

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo P8400 34.2
+328%
Atom Z520 146.28

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 2 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8400 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom Z520, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8400 and Atom Z520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Core 2 Duo P8400
Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 84 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8400 or Atom Z520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.