Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 vs Core 2 Duo P7550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28592869
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency2.011.43
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.1-1.125V
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7550 0.53
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 0.53

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P7550 2439
+24.1%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1965

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P7550 4645
+21%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 3840

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P7550 2004
+23.9%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1618

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo P7550 35.6
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 34.9
+2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2009 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7550 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7550 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
Core 2 Duo P7550
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7550 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.