Duron 850 vs Core 2 Duo P7370

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2880not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD Duron
Power efficiency1.89no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)14 May 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.85 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate1066 MHz200 MT/s
Multiplierno data8.5
L2 cache3 MB64 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data105.68 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 14 May 2001
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm

Core 2 Duo P7370 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P7370 is a notebook processor while Duron 850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7370 and Duron 850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Duo P7370
AMD Duron 850
Duron 850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo P7370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Duron 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7370 or Duron 850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.