Pentium 4 P4 3.0 vs Core 2 Duo P7350
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Pentium 4 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.062V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 89 Watt |
Core 2 Duo P7350 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 256% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo P7350 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 P4 3.0 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7350 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
