Celeron 420 vs Core 2 Duo P7350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7350
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.47
+213%
Celeron 420
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.15

Core 2 Duo P7350 outperforms Celeron 420 by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29263323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.780.41
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$23

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data60 °C
Number of transistors410 Million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.062V-1.15V1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7350 0.47
+213%
Celeron 420 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7350 749
+219%
Celeron 420 235

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7350 has a 213.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo P7350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P7350 is a notebook processor while Celeron 420 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7350 and Celeron 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Core 2 Duo P7350
Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 66 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 170 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7350 or Celeron 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.