Pentium Dual Core T3400 vs Core 2 Duo E8435
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2707 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium Dual Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.50 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.067 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | P | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 March 2009 | 1 October 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E8435 has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium Dual T3400, on the other hand, has 25.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8435 and Pentium Dual Core T3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
