Celeron G1101 vs Core 2 Duo E8400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
+7.4%
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms Celeron G1101 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26852734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.060.88
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size104 mm281 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8400 0.73
+7.4%
Celeron G1101 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8400 1165
+7.3%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.68
Recency 1 January 2008 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8400 has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1101, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2293 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8400 or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.