Celeron M U3400 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2768 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.91 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 1.06 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
Celeron M U3400 has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Duo E7200 is a desktop processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
