Opteron 240 EE vs Core 2 Duo E6850
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Opteron 240 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2693 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.03 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | February 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Opteron 240 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Opteron 240 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E6850 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 240 EE, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Opteron 240 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Duo E6850 is a desktop processor while Opteron 240 EE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Opteron 240 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
