Celeron P4500 vs Core 2 Duo E6700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6700
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.63
+16.7%
Celeron P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54

Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Celeron P4500 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27722842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.911.45
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate1066 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Celeron P4500.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6700 0.63
+16.7%
Celeron P4500 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6700 990
+16.7%
Celeron P4500 848

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.54
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6700 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron P4500, on the other hand, has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4500 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop processor while Celeron P4500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Celeron P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700
Intel Celeron P4500
Celeron P4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6700 or Celeron P4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.