Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core 2 Duo E6320

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6320
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.45
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+2382%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6320 by a whopping 2382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2945702
Place by popularitynot in top-1008
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.81
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.6616.26
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPLGA775AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6320 0.45
Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+2382%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6320 717
Ryzen 5 3600 17742
+2374%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6320 206
Ryzen 5 3600 1614
+683%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6320 339
Ryzen 5 3600 6912
+1939%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 11.17
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 5 3600 has a 2382.2% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
Core 2 Duo E6320
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 61 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17583 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6320 or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.