Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Core 2 Duo E6305
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7840HX has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo E6305 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7840HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6305 and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
