Phenom II X3 P860 vs Celeron U3600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 11 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 3600 MHz |
Multiplier | 9 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | BGA1288 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) |
FMA | + | - |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | no data |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 January 2011 | 4 October 2010 |
Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
Threads | 2 | 3 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron U3600 has an age advantage of 3 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X3 P860, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3600 and Phenom II X3 P860, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.