Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron T3100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3100
2008
35 Watt
0.38
+15.2%
Athlon II Neo K345
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 12 Watt
0.33

Celeron T3100 outperforms Athlon II Neo K345 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30313087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency1.032.60
Architecture codenameno dataChamplain (2010−2011)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data2000 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
PowerNow-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3100 0.38
+15.2%
Athlon II Neo K345 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
+13.7%
Athlon II Neo K345 527

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.33
Recency 1 July 2008 18 December 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

Celeron T3100 has a 15.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II Neo K345, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron T3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II Neo K345 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and Athlon II Neo K345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD Athlon II Neo K345
Athlon II Neo K345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon II Neo K345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or Athlon II Neo K345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.