Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 vs Celeron T3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron T1600 Celeron T1700 Celeron T3000 Celeron T3100 Celeron T3300 Celeron T3500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 2700+ Athlon 64 L110 Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3100
2008
35 Watt
0.38
+15.2%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33

Celeron T3100 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron T3100 Celeron T3100
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30153074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno data2x Athlon 64
Power efficiency1.031.01
Architecture codenameno dataTaylor / Hawk-256
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3100 0.38
+15.2%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
+15.6%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.38 0.33
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron T3100 has a 15.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron T3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron T3100 Celeron T3100
vs
E1-7010 E1 7010
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Pentium T2310 Pentium T2310
Celeron T3100 Celeron T3100
vs
Turion II Neo K625 Turion II Neo K625
Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Atom D2500 Atom D2500
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Pentium SU4100 Pentium SU4100
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Pentium T2330 Pentium T2330
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Core 2 Duo L7400 Core 2 Duo L7400
i3-2365M Core i3 2365M
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Celeron N3010 Celeron N3010
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Celeron T3000 Celeron T3000
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.