Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 vs Celeron 3865U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3215U Celeron 3755U Celeron 3765U Celeron 3855U Celeron 3865U Celeron 3867U Celeron 3955U Celeron 3965U Celeron 3965Y
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+155%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33

Celeron 3865U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25903089
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron2x Athlon 64
Power efficiency5.301.01
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)Taylor / Hawk-256
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size98.7 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3865U 0.84
+155%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3865U 1329
+157%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.84 0.33
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron 3865U has a 154.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3865U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3865U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
vs
A6-9225 A6 9225
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
vs
A8-4555M A8 4555M
Pentium Dual SU4100 Pentium Dual Core SU4100
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Duo U2400 Core Duo U2400
Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Atom D2500 Atom D2500
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Pentium SU4100 Pentium SU4100
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Pentium T2330 Pentium T2330
Celeron T3100 Celeron T3100
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
Core 2 Duo L7400 Core 2 Duo L7400
i3-2365M Core i3 2365M
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3865U or Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.