Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Celeron T3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiencyno data32.79
Architecture codenameno dataRembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3000 687
Ryzen 9 6900HX 24768
+3505%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T3000 225
Ryzen 9 6900HX 1998
+788%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T3000 384
Ryzen 9 6900HX 9676
+2420%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron T3000 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 6900HX, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3000 and Ryzen 9 6900HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3000
Celeron T3000
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 458 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3000 or Ryzen 9 6900HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.