Xeon Gold 6314U vs Celeron T1600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 137 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.96 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 48 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 6 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron T1600 has 485.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron T1600 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6314U is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
