C-30 vs Celeron P4505

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron P4505 and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD C-Series
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date28 March 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron P4505 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size81 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P4505 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P4505 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data40 nm, 1.24-1.35V
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron P4505 and C-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P4505 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P4505 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 6250
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron P4505 and C-30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P4505 and C-30.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron P4505 689
+287%
C-30 178

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 March 2010 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron P4505 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-30, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron P4505 and C-30. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P4505 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron P4505
Celeron P4505
AMD C-30
C-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron P4505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron P4505 or C-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.