3015e vs Celeron P1053

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron P1053 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data26.97
Architecture codenameJasper Forest (2010)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date12 February 2010 (14 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron P1053 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P1053 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1366FT5
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P1053 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P1053 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P1053 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P1053 and 3015e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2010 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 6 Watt

3015e has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron P1053 and 3015e. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron P1053 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P1053 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron P1053
Celeron P1053
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron P1053 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron P1053 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.