Ryzen 5 8400F vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.47
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.44
+950%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2191467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3361.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.6221.66
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 1743% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.47
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.44
+950%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
Ryzen 5 8400F 23635
+953%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 15.44
Recency 17 July 2022 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N6211 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has a 950.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 145 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.