Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Celeron N5105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.84
+482%

Ryzen 9 6900HS outperforms Celeron N5105 by a whopping 482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1750478
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency24.1340.13
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FP7
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.55
Ryzen 9 6900HS 14.84
+482%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5105 4053
Ryzen 9 6900HS 23568
+481%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N5105 472
Ryzen 9 6900HS 1854
+293%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N5105 1284
Ryzen 9 6900HS 8801
+585%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5105 368
Ryzen 9 6900HS 2161
+487%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5105 108
Ryzen 9 6900HS 245
+127%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5105 2080
Ryzen 9 6900HS 9224
+343%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5105 1573
+593%
Ryzen 9 6900HS 227

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5105 653
Ryzen 9 6900HS 1537
+135%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5105 3108
Ryzen 9 6900HS 5805
+86.8%

7-Zip

Celeron N5105 11153
Ryzen 9 6900HS 62006
+456%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5105 134
Ryzen 9 6900HS 281
+109%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron N5105 531
Ryzen 9 6900HS 1527
+188%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron N5105 96
Ryzen 9 6900HS 197
+105%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron N5105 2940
+670%
Ryzen 9 6900HS 382

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 14.84
Integrated graphics card 5.58 16.00
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N5105 has 250% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 6900HS, on the other hand, has a 482% higher aggregate performance score, 186.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 6900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Ryzen 9 6900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 701 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or Ryzen 9 6900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.