EPYC 4484PX vs Celeron N5105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+1162%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Celeron N5105 by a whopping 1162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1737126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency24.1325.38
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338AM5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes828
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.55
EPYC 4484PX 32.18
+1162%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5105 4053
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+1161%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 32.18
Integrated graphics card 5.58 1.98
Recency 11 January 2021 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron N5105 has 181.8% faster integrated GPU, and 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 1162% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 695 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.