Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron N5105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.65
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.87
+272%

Core Ultra 7 164U outperforms Celeron N5105 by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1729794
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency24.16100.00
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$448

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads414
Base clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency800 MHz1.8 GHz
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes88
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.65
Ultra 7 164U 9.87
+272%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5105 4054
Ultra 7 164U 15106
+273%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5105 368
Ultra 7 164U 1304
+254%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5105 108
Ultra 7 164U 225
+108%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5105 2080
Ultra 7 164U 7503
+261%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5105 1573
+298%
Ultra 7 164U 395

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5105 653
Ultra 7 164U 1522
+133%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5105 3108
Ultra 7 164U 4619
+48.6%

7-Zip

Celeron N5105 11153
Ultra 7 164U 29361
+163%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5105 134
Ultra 7 164U 236
+75.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 9.87
Recency 11 January 2021 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 14
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 7 164U has a 272.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 164U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 164U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 680 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.