Celeron N6211 vs N5095A
Aggregate performance score
N5095A outperforms N6211 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1655 | 2113 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Elkhart Lake |
| Architecture codename | no data | Elkhart Lake |
| Release date | 1 July 2021 (3 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | no data | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211.
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
N5095A outperforms N6211 by 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
N5095A outperforms N6211 by 83% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.66 | 1.45 |
| Recency | 1 July 2021 | 17 July 2022 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N5095A has a 83.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N5095A is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095A and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
